MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
RENEWED MOTION BY DEFENDANTS BOLLINGER, LEHMAN, AND SHIELDS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON GROUNDS OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY


 

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE PRESENTED

Whether the individual University and Law School officials who are sued for damages in their individual capacities are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s damages claims because the undisputed record demonstrates that they have not violated plaintiff’s “clearly established constitutional rights,” and therefore enjoy a qualified immunity from suit under the Supreme Court�s decision in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).




Memorandum Table of Contents   |  Grutter briefs – Table of Contents


Questions? Comments? Please send e-mail to diversitymatters@umich.edu.
Site last updated: September 5, 2012.   Copyright © 1997–2013 Regents of the University of Michigan.